Springtime Chl-a concentration is here used as a proxy for productive surface waters. In the Baltic Sea Spatial Pressure and Impact Index (SPIA), areas with high springtime phytoplankton production will be given higher importance, as they are considered important areas for the Baltic Sea food web. In the current map, mean of springtime maximum weekly values (weeks 12-22 for the HOLAS3 assessment period 2016-2021). Satellite Chl-a concentration of the surface waters has been used and converted to index by Finnish Environment institute with resolution of 1 km x 1 km grid cells.

This dataset contains datasets for the Eutrophication assessment developed under the HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea (HOLAS 3). The dataset contains all Baltic Sea monitoring CTD data reported by HELCOM Contracting Parties to ICES for the HOLAS3 assessment period 2016-2021. The data have been reported using the ICES Ocean reporting format: https://www.ices.dk/data/data-portals/Pages/ocean-format.aspx https://www.ices.dk/data/Documents/ocean/ICES-Oceanography-Data-Submission-Format.zip

This pre-core indicator evaluates the eutrophication status of the Baltic Sea area based on cyanobacterial bloom index. The index is calculated using two types of data: biomass data and Earth observation data. More detailed description on methodology can be found at HELCOM pre-core indicator report and http://www.helcom.fi/Documents/Eutrophication%20assessment%20manual.pdf This dataset displays the result of the indicator in HELCOM Assessment Scale 4 (Division of the Baltic Sea into 17 open sea sub-basins and division of coastal areas to WFD water types or water bodies), but applicable only to certain open sea assessment units. Attribute information: "HELCOM_ID" = Code of the HELCOM scale 4 assessment unit "Country" = country/ opensea "level_2" = name of the subbasin "level_4" = Name of the HELCOM scale 4 assessment unit "Area (km2)" = Area of the HELCOM scale 2 assessment unit “Season” = Season of the indicator (Summer = June-September) “Period” = Assessment unit period start and end year (20162021 = 2016 – 2021) "Indicator value (ES)" = Indicator value calculated for the assessment unit "Standard deviation (STD)" = Standard deviation of data used for calculating ES "Number of samples " = Number of samples (not applicable for cyanobacterial bloom index) "Threshold value (ET)" = Commonly agreed threshold value "Ratio between ES and ET (ER)" = Ratio between ES and ET (in case of indicator with positive response to eutrophication) "ES_SCORE” = Confidence based on the data used for calculating ES "ET_SCORE” = Confidence of target-setting procedure "I_SCORE” = Confidence (%) = average of ES-Score and ET-Score "Indicator Weight" = Indicator Weight in integrated eutrophication assessment “Status” = Status of the indicator (“Achieve”, “Fail”, “Not assessed” or "Not applicable") "AULEVEL" = Assessment unit level used for the indicator "FID_12" = "Indicator" = Indicator name “CONFIDENCE” = Confidence of result based on I-SCORE (“High”, “Moderate”, “Low” or "Not assessed")

Data represent the ecosystem service quantified benefit estimates in the Baltic Sea in 1x1km grid. Map is based on data submitted for the HOLAS3 data call and the methodology for estimating these benefits is described in the HOLAS 3 ESA thematic assessment report. The process involves the development of separate ecosystem component distribution maps and ecosystem service provision rate maps, which are then multiplied to calculate the estimated delivery of bio-physical benefits.

This dataset represents the aggregated results for pelagic habitat indicators from eutrophication assessment (Chlorophyll-a and Water Clarity). The dataset was created in order to update the information for the integrated assessment under HOLAS 3. MEAN_EQRS_PelagicIntegration_NEW=Mean of Chrolophyll-a and Water clarity indicator MEAN_EQRS_CPHL=Mean EQRS of Chlorophyll-a Clarity indicator 2016-2021 MEAN_EQRS_SECC=Mean EQRS of Water Clarity indicator 2016-2021 Status=Status of Assessment unit based on mean of Chrolophyll-a and Water clarity indicator (Good, Moderate, Poor, Bad, Not assessed)

This dataset contains datasets for the Eutrophication assessment developed under the HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea (HOLAS 3). The dataset contains all Baltic Sea monitoring bottle data reported by HELCOM Contracting Parties to ICES for the HOLAS3 assessment period 2016-2021. The data have been reported using the ICES Ocean reporting format: https://www.ices.dk/data/data-portals/Pages/ocean-format.aspx https://www.ices.dk/data/Documents/ocean/ICES-Oceanography-Data-Submission-Format.zip

Potential effect of continuous noise to mobile species assesses the cumulative potential effect of continuous noise on mobile species and their presence in the HELCOM area. The evaluation is based on the pressure layer on input of continuous noise, combined with information on the distribution of 15 mobile species and their habitats. The thematic analyses on the potential effect of continuous noise to mobile species is calculated for each assessment unit (1 km2 grid cells) and the data set covers the time period 2016-2021. Spatial Pressure and Impact Assessment (SPIA) is the framework for assessing spatial and cumulative pressures and impacts in HOLAS 3, and this analyses present a thematic assessment including only a certain subset of layers. The framework also includes results for the Baltic Sea Impact Index (full cumulative impact assessment), Baltic Sea Pressure Index (full cumulative pressure assessment), and other thematic assessments where a subset of pressure and ecosystem layers are used. For more info please - visit the HOLAS 3 website (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/) - download the report thematic assessment of spatial distribution of pressures and impacts 2016-2021 (https://helcom.fi/post_type_publ/holas3_spa) - or check out the HELCOM SPIA online tool to make calculations for any desired combination of pressures and ecosystem layers (https://maps.helcom.fi/website/bsii/). Please scroll down to "Lineage" for a more detailed description of the methodology.

The assessment results for waterbirds for the HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea (HOLAS 3) contains the following datasets: Integrated Biodiversity Status Assessment for Waterbirds, Integrated Biodiversity Status Assessment for surface-feeding birds, Integrated Biodiversity Status Assessment for pelagic-feeding birds, Integrated Biodiversity Status Assessment for benthic-feeding birds, Integrated Biodiversity Status Assessment for wading birds, and Integrated Biodiversity Status Assessment for grazing birds. Status is shown in five categories based on the integrated assessment scores obtained in the tool. Biological Quality Ratios (BQR) above 0.6 correspond to good status. The datasets were created using the BEAT tool. https://github.com/helcomsecretariat/BEAT Attribute information: "Birds_ag" = Birds group area "GroupName" = Birds group area name "BQR" = Biological Quality Ratio "Conf" = Confidence of the assessment (0-1, higher values mean higher confidence) "ConfClass" = Confidence class "Status" = Integrated status category (0-0.2 = not good (lowest score), 0.2-0.4 = not good (lower score), 0.4-0.6 = not good (low score), 0.6-0.8 = good (high score), 0.8-1.0 = good (highest score)) "ProportionSpecies" = Proportion of species in good status "SAUlevel" = Spatial assessment unit ID in which the assessment status took place "EcosystemComponent" = Ecosystem component assessed

This dataset contains the integrated status assessment for seals (grey seals, harbour seals and ringed seals), harbour porpoise and waterbirds (surface-feeding birds, pelagic-feeding birds, benthic-feeding birds, wading birds, and grazing birds) with bycatch for the HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea (HOLAS 3). Status is shown in five categories based on the integrated assessment scores obtained in the tool. Biological Quality Ratios (BQR) above 0.6 correspond to good status. The datasets were created using the BEAT tool. https://github.com/helcomsecretariat/BEAT Attribute information for mammals: "level_2" = HELCOM sub-basins (name of the scale 2 assessment unit) "HELCOM_ID" = id of the HELCOM assessment unit "SAUID" = ID number for the spatial assessment unit "SAULEVEL" = spatial assessment unit ID in which the assessment status took place "SAU" = Name the spatial assessment unit "ECID" = Ecosystem component id "EClevel" = Ecosystem component assessed level "EcosystemC" = Ecosystem component assessed "Status" = Integrated status category (0-0.2 = not good (lowest score), 0.2-0.4 = not good (lower score), 0.4-0.6 = not good (low score), 0.6-0.8 = good (high score), 0.8-1.0 = good (highest score)) "Conf" = Confidence of the assessment (0-1, higher values mean higher confidence) "ConfClass" = Confidence class "BQR" = Biological Quality Ratio "Status_EQR" = Status of the Biological Quality Ratio Attribute information for waterbirds: "Birds_ag" = Birds group area "GroupName" = Birds group area name "level_2" = Name of the HELCOM assessment unit in scale 2 "HELCOM_ID" = Code of the HELCOM scale 2 assessment unit "BQR" = Biological Quality Ratio "Conf" = Confidence of the assessment (0-1, higher values mean higher confidence) "ConfClass" = Confidence class

The assessment results for pelagic habitats for the HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea (HOLAS 3) based on integrating following indicators: Zooplankton mean size and total stock, Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups, Cyanobacterial bloom index, Diatom-dinoflagellate index. Status is shown in five categories based on the integrated assessment scores obtained in the tool. Biological Quality Ratios (BQR) above 0.6 correspond to good status. The datasets were created using the BEAT tool. https://github.com/helcomsecretariat/BEAT German coastal areas were assessed based on WFD indicators.